A UK magazine called Healthy is doing a poll - is saturated fat bad or good for us?
Scroll to the bottom and vote!
Love is a function of communication so speak up!
Hi Lynn - I think the reporters point was that a low fat diet was only ONE component of the study which resulted, however marginally, in a reversal of coronary plaque. The difference BTW, was easily attributable to statistical error. Dr. Eades discussed this at one time on his amazing blog.
Of course, Dr. Ornish shouts out from upon high that it was his low fat diet that did reversed the plaque. Of course, that's agenda talking and not a true scientist.
Posted by: Fred Hahn | April 13, 2009 at 06:27 PM
Fred -
Speaking of fat...I'm no scientist, but citing a 29 year old study that included a cessation of smoking to make a recommendation for a low-fat diet is preposterous.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/14/health/nutrition/14qna.html?_r=1
Lynn
Posted by: Lynn | April 13, 2009 at 04:08 PM
Nice -- too bad we can't link the article but good for them for realizing that will sell more mags.
Posted by: Matt | April 02, 2009 at 11:58 AM